MAGNETIC CURRENT ED LEEDSKALNIN PDF

Following is the result of my two years experiment with magnets at Rock Gate, seventeen miles Southwest from Miami, Florida. First I will describe what a magnet is. You have seen straight bar magnets, U shape magnets, sphere or ball magnets and Alnico magnets in many shapes, and usually a hole in the middle. In all magnets one end of the metal is North Pole and the other South Pole, and those which have no end one side is North Pole and the other South Pole.

Author:Malak Kagul
Country:Equatorial Guinea
Language:English (Spanish)
Genre:Photos
Published (Last):27 November 2005
Pages:96
PDF File Size:15.2 Mb
ePub File Size:5.95 Mb
ISBN:179-2-86928-893-8
Downloads:47931
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader:Shaktigor



In Rosalind Franklin discovered the structure of DNA using a technique called x-ray crystallography or x-ray diffraction. Crystallographers shoot x-rays at matter and they diffract onto a detector. Based on the diffraction pattern, a 3-D model of complex crystalline structures can be calculated. It is an effective technique still used today. Leedskalnin uses a similar technique demonstrated in the experiment below to evaluate the structure of electricity. Today, we would recognize his description as a double helix: The real magnet is the substance that is circulating in the metal.

Each particle in the substance is an individual magnet by itself, and both North and South Pole individual magnets Unipole: A Single Helix The true essence of duality is a singularity. Likewise, the individual North and South pole magnets are not monopoles, but rather unipoles because a helix can only propagate toward one pole a time.

Coincidentally, the mathematical term for either end of any helix is Pole. The individual North or South Pole magnets are then one one in the same with the only difference being their direcection of travel relative to one another. To reiterates, the helical shape gives them the ability to function as either pole, which is determined by their direction of travel.

For instance, Leedskalnin tells us specifically that they are one in the same on the first page of Magnetic Current: The helix structure is the only structure that fits this definition. The helix is the only structure capable of fully demonstrating the observable behavior of magnetism and gravity.

The helix is the only structure that has the ability to propel through resistance by axial rotation alone. It is commonly known that the North pole of a magnet is only attracted to the South pole of another magnet if they are facing each other, because by definition.

Break a bar magnet into any two unequal portions. Again, magnets that travel in the same direction are not attracted to one another because by definition they have same polarity. They repel. After viewing the video below, you can get a better understanding of the principles of repulsion by putting two right hand notebook spirals on a wooden rod. Move the one in back forward until it hits the one in front. Turn it slowly while moving it forward.

They will not unite integrally like attracting magnets. This demonstrates an aspect of the cumulative power of magnetism and helps in understanding the mechanics of polarization.

Put only one helix on the wooden rod and define a pole to screw toward. Now cut the helix into three or four equal or unequal segments. They will all still screw toward the defined pole. The helical shape gives them the power to propagate forward from rotation alone - they are always rotating in an effort to screw themselves forward, but that can only get them so far, especially when the air is not an ideal substance for this type of propulsion system.

When the circuit is complete they are allowed to screw against each other where they attain pulling power along with their pushing power - the more tension between the two, the harder they work to screw forward against each other voltage. North and South pole magnets are only truly content when they are able to screw against each other. The orbit of the PMH provides the right geometrical structure for them to do this forever.

Natural AC Leedskalnin explains that the AC coming from the transformer outside of your house is AC before it hits the transformer so the poles inside transformer alternate. He tells us that the action of natural AC is already taking place in the power lines before manmade AC is ran through them — that the power lines themselves are acting like generators. Here are a few things Leedskalnin teaches about magnet making: Now about the generator, in the first place all currents are alternating.

To get direct currents we have to use a commutator. To make magnets with currents from batteries and dynamos with a single wire the metal will have to be put on the wire in such a way so that the magnets which are coming out of the wire will be running in the metal starting form the middle of the metal and run to the end and not from end to middle and across a they did the last time.

In a car battery the North Pole magnets run out of positive terminal and South Pole magnets run out of negative terminal. Both kinds of magnets are running, one kind of magnets against the other kind, and are running in the same right-hand screw fashion. By using the same whirling motion and running one kind of magnets against the other kind, they throw their own magnets form the wire in opposite directions.

That is why if you put a magnet metal across the copper wire the one end is North Pole and the other end is South Pole. Break five inches long piece of the fishing line [steel], put the middle of the wire across and on top of the copper wire, touch the battery, hold until the copper wire gets hot, dip the middle of the wire in iron filings, then you will see how long a magnet can be made with this equipment. The coil is not necessary to make magnetic currents.

Currents can be created with a single wire. The coil is necessary to increase the amount and strength of the currents. Man Made AC. Millions of people all over the world are being fooled by the non-existing electrons. Here is how the electrons came into existence. Thomson invented an imaginary baby and called it an electron. Rutherford adopted it and now the men with the long hair are nursing it.

The electron has a brother and its name is proton, but it is heavy and lazy. It remains stationary in the middle, but the electron has to run around it. To the electrical engineers the positive electricity is everything, the negative electricity is nothing, but to the physicists the negative electricity is everything, and the positive electricity is nothing.

Looking from a neutral standpoint they cancel each other, so we have no electricity, but we have something. If we do not know how to handle the thing that comes through a wire from a generator or a battery, we will get badly shocked. Read the booklet "Magnetic Current" then you will know what the thing is, and the way it runs through a wire.

The invention of an electron came by a tricky method in using electricity in a vacuum tube. That connection gave the negative terminal a double dose of strength, and so it became hotter and could push more. It was called cathode and the positive terminal anode, and the electricity that passed from the cathode to the anode was called electrons. In case the inventor had used normally direct methods to find out what the electricity was he would have found out that the positive and negative electricity is in equal strength, and are running positive electricity against the negative electricity.

That can be seen by connecting each of two pieces of soft iron wire with each terminal of a car battery and then by putting together and pulling away each loose end of the soft iron wire.

More sparks can be seen coming out of the positive terminal than from the negative terminal. This direct method is more reliable than the tricky method in the vacuum tube. The trouble with the physicists is they use indirect and ultra-indirect methods to come to their conclusions.

If the inventor of electrons had a vacuum tube in which his electrons could run close to the top of the vacuum tube from the west side of the cathode to the east side of the anode and then would hang a vertically hanging magnet that is made from three-inch long hard steel fishing wire, and then hang one magnet pole at one time right on top in the middle of his stream of electrons, then he would have seen the north pole magnet swinging north, and the south pole magnet swinging south.

The same thing will happen if the magnets are held above any wire where the electricity is running through. Those two vertically hanging magnets prove that the electricity is composed of two different and equal forces.

Put U shape magnet one inch from loop, north pole south side of the loop. The north pole magnet will pull in the loop. Put the south pole magnet in the same place. It will push the loop away. Put the south pole magnet north side of the loop, this time it will pull the loop in. Put the north pole magnet in the same place, it will push the loop away. This indicates that electricity the same as a magnet bar is composed of two equal forces, and each force is running one against the other in whirling right hand twist, but those forces in the wire have higher speed, and both forces are coming out across from the same wire.

One of the forces is north pole magnets and the other is south pole magnets. They are the cosmic forces. Your electric motor is turned around on its axis by north and south pole magnets. Even you could not start your car without the north and south pole magnets.

If electricity is made with north and south pole magnets and the electric motor is turned around on its axis by the north and south pole magnets as is the fact, then this will bring up a question, where then are those Thomson electrons. They are not around the electric motor. The plain answer is they are non-existing.

Imaginary Baby Leedskalnin can be downright ornery with his wordplay, but no less cunning. His didactic dissertation on education in exemplified here, now in a more evolved ego charged form, the innocent generationally perpetuated ignorance driven epistemological rupture he notes to have mislead humanity since the beginning — when the underlying foundational or base understandings are incorrect, any ideas built upon them are also incorrect.

Leedskalnin cites specific instances of how this practice continues to retard advancements in all branches of science. Mathematical Reasoning The mathematics behind modern electromagnetic theory may have been originally intended to explain the dynamics postulated on this website.

ALPINE PXI-H990 PDF

A Book in Every home - by Ed Leedskalnin (original book scan 1936)

Dajin That causes the North and South Pole magnets to run in Northeast and Southwest direction My location is too far away from leesskalnin magnetic poles so all my magnets are guided by the general stream of individual North and South Pole magnets that are passing by. To run they have to run one against the other. This experiment shows two things, one that the magnets can be sent out in straight streams, and the other whatever kind of magnets you are sending out the other kind of magnets are coming magnetid to you. You saw how magnetic currents are made in battery from metal by acid. All books that are written are wrong, the one who is not educated cannot write a book and the one who is educated, is really not educated but he is misled and the one who is misled cannot write a book which is correct. They are in constant motion, they are running one kind of magnets against the other kind, and if guided in the right channels they possess perpetual power.

ASTM A767 PDF

ED LEEDSKALNIN BOOK PDF

October edited October I see a photo of Edward Leedskalnin holding a copy of the book, "A Book In Every Home" with completely different cover art than the one featured here. This tells me that, at the very least, the version featured here is not the original version. The version which Leedskalnin is holding up for the world to see, is the one I want to get my hands on. I feel Ed wants us to change our perspective. When we look at a building for a few minutes, walk away, and then asked if we can draw that building in detail without going back to take a look, would it be possible?

Related Articles